Internet-Draft IS-IS PG June 2026
Barth, et al. Expires 24 December 2026 [Page]
Workgroup:
LSR WG
Internet-Draft:
draft-many-lsr-power-group-03
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Authors:
C. Barth
HPE
T. Li
HPE
V. P. Beeram
HPE
R. Bonica
HPE

Using IS-IS To Advertise Power Group Membership

Abstract

Many networks have a daily utilization pattern. For example, a network might be busy during the day and less busy at night.

If the network is robust, it has enough capacity to satisfy demand during peak hours and excess capacity during non-peak hours. That excess capacity increases energy costs and environmental impact.

[I-D.many-teas-power-steering] introduces a Power Conserving Path Placement Strategy (PCPPS). When possible, PCPPS concentrates traffic onto a small set of network resources. When traffic is concentrated onto a small set of network resources, other network resources become idle and can be powered down until they are needed again. This solves the problem of excess capacity during non-peak hours.

PCPPS uses information that is distributed by an IGP. This document specifies the IS-IS encoding for that information.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 24 December 2026.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

Many networks have a daily utilization pattern. For example, a network might be busy during the day and less busy at night.

If the network is robust, it has enough capacity to satisfy demand during peak hours and excess capacity during non-peak hours. That excess capacity increases energy costs and environmental impact.

[I-D.many-teas-power-steering] introduces a Power Conserving Path Placement Strategy (PCPPS). When possible, PCPPS concentrates traffic onto a small set of network resources. When traffic is concentrated onto a small set of network resources, other network resources become idle and can be powered down until they are needed again. This solves the problem of excess capacity during non-peak hours.

PCPPS uses information that is distributed by an IGP. This document specifies the IS-IS encoding for that information.

2. Conventions and Definitions

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

2.1. Terminology

The following terms are used as defined in [I-D.many-teas-power-steering]:

  • Power Group

  • Sleep Status, AWAKE and ASLEEP

  • Power Savings Potential (PSP)

4. Security Considerations

TBD

5. IANA Considerations

IANA is requested to add the following entries to the IS-IS Top-Level TLV Codepoints registry (https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml#tlv-codepoints):

Table 1: IS-IS Top-Level TLV Codepoints
Value Name IIH LSP SNP Purge MP Status Reference
TBD1 Power Group N Y N N N This document
TBD2 Sleeping Adjacencies N Y N N N This document

IANA is also requested to add the following entries to the IS-IS Sub-TLVs for TLVs Advertising Neighbor Information registry (https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml#isis-tlv-codepoints-advertising-neighbor-information):

Table 2: IS-IS Sub-TLVs for TLVs Advertising Neighbor Information
Type Description 22 23 25 141 222 223 MP Reference
TBD3 Power Group Member Y Y Y(s) Y Y Y N This document
TBD4 Interface PSP Y Y Y(s) Y Y Y N This document
TBD5 Unidirectional Sleeping Bandwith Y Y Y(s) Y Y Y N This document

IANA is also requested to add the following entry to the IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values registry (https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints/isis-tlv-codepoints.xhtml#isis-tlv-codepoints-19of22):

Table 3: IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values
Value Name L2BM Reference
TBD5 Power-Sleep Capable N This document

6. Acknowledgements

Thanks to Les Ginsberg for his review and comments.

7. Normative References

[I-D.many-teas-power-steering]
Barth, C., Li, T., Beeram, V. P., and R. P. Bonica, "A Power Conserving Path Placement Strategy (PCPPS)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-many-teas-power-steering-00, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-many-teas-power-steering-00>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.

Authors' Addresses

Colby Barth
HPE
United States of America
Tony Li
HPE
United States of America
Vishnu Pavan Beeram
HPE
United States of America
Ron Bonica
HPE
United States of America