Internet-Draft | FN-DSA for JOSE and COSE | October 2025 |
Prorock, et al. | Expires 15 April 2026 | [Page] |
This document specifies JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) and CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) serializations for FFT (fast-Fourier transform) over NTRU-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm (FN-DSA), a Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) digital signature scheme defined in US NIST FIPS 206 (expected to be published in late 2026 early 2027).¶
It does not define new cryptographic primitives; rather, it specifies how existing FN-DSA mechanisms are serialized for use in JOSE and COSE. This document registers signature algorithms for JOSE and COSE, specifically FN-DSA-512
and FN-DSA-1024
.¶
This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.¶
The latest revision of this draft can be found at https://cose-wg.github.io/draft-ietf-cose-falcon/draft-ietf-cose-falcon.html. Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-falcon/.¶
Discussion of this document takes place on the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption Working Group mailing list (mailto:cose@ietf.org), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/. Subscribe at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose/.¶
Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-falcon.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 15 April 2026.¶
Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
This document specifies JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) and CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) serializations for FFT (fast-Fourier transform) over NTRU-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm (FN-DSA), a Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) digital signature scheme defined in US NIST FIPS 206 (expected to be published in late 2026 early 2027).¶
FN-DSA (formerly known as Falcon) is a lattice-based digital signature scheme based on the GPV hash-and-sign framework [GPV08], instantiated over NTRU lattices with fast Fourier sampling techniques [DP16]. The core hard problem underlying FN-DSA is the SIS (Short Integer Solution) problem over NTRU lattices.¶
FN-DSA (formerly known as Falcon) is a digital signature algorithm based on lattice mathematics. It follows the hash-and-sign design introduced by Gentry, Peikert, and Vaikuntanathan [GPV08]. FN-DSA operates on NTRU lattices and uses fast Fourier techniques [DP16] to make signature generation compact and efficient. The security of the scheme relies on the hardness of solving certain lattice problems, in particular the Short Integer Solution (SIS) problem.¶
FN-DSA offers:¶
Post-quantum security under the assumption that NTRU-SIS remains hard.¶
Compactness in key and signature size.¶
Efficient operations (roughly O(n log n)).¶
A requirement for careful implementation to avoid side-channel leakage (notably Gaussian sampling must be constant-time where applicable).¶
The sizes of public key, private key, and signature for the parameter sets are the same as in the original Falcon specification:¶
Parameter Set | Signature size (bytes) | Public Key size (bytes) | Private Key size (bytes) |
---|---|---|---|
FN-DSA-512 | 666 | 897 | 1281 |
FN-DSA-1024 | 1280 | 1793 | 2305 |
For a detailed comparison of FN-DSA with ML-DSA [USNIST.FIPS.204] and SLH-DSA [USNIST.FIPS.205] see Section 11.3 of [I-D.draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers].¶
This document defines how FN-DSA is used with JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) [RFC7515] and CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) [RFC9052] [RFC9053].¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
The FN-DSA Signature Scheme is parameterized to support different security levels.¶
This document introduces the registration of the following algorithms in [IANA.jose]:¶
Name | alg | Description |
---|---|---|
FN-DSA-512 | FN-DSA-512 | FN-DSA with parameter set 512 |
FN-DSA-1024 | FN-DSA-1024 | FN-DSA with parameter set 1024 |
This document introduces the registration of the following algorithms in [IANA.cose]:¶
Name | alg | Description |
---|---|---|
FN-DSA-512 | TBD1 (-54) | CBOR Object Signing Algorithm for FALCON512 |
FN-DSA-1024 | TBD2 (-55) | CBOR Object Signing Algorithm for FALCON1024 |
The FN-DSA Algorithm Family uses the Algorithm Key Pair (AKP) key type, as defined in [I-D.draft-ietf-cose-dilithium].¶
The specific algorithms for FN-DSA, such as FALCON512 and FALCON1024, are defined in this document and are used in the alg
value of an AKP key representation to specify the corresponding algorithm.¶
Thumbprints for FN-DSA keys are computed according to the process described in [I-D.draft-ietf-cose-dilithium].¶
The security considerations of [RFC7515], [RFC7517] and [RFC9053] apply to this specification as well.¶
A detailed security analysis of FN-DSA is beyond the scope of this specification; see [USNIST.FIPS.206] for additional details.¶
All the usual caveats for PQC and side-channel resistance apply.¶
Implementations MUST ensure that alg
matches the intended algorithm variant.¶
Private implementations of sampling (Gaussian, etc.) must be constant-time to prevent leakage.¶
Public keys SHOULD be validated before use (e.g., against encoding constraints).¶
Nonces, random values, blinding factors (if used) MUST originate from a secure source of randomness.¶
Implementers should follow best practices to mitigate timing, cache, and power side channels, such as:¶
All required randomness (e.g. for signature generation) MUST be derived from a cryptographically secure, high-entropy source.¶
IANA is requested to add the following entries to the COSE Algorithms Registry. The following completed registration templates are provided as described in [RFC9053] and [RFC9054].¶
IANA is requested to add the following entries to the JSON Web Signature and Encryption Algorithms Registry. The following completed registration templates are provided as described in [RFC7518].¶
{ "kty": "AKP", "alg": "FN-DSA-512", "pub": "V53SIdVF...uvw2nuCQ", "priv": "V53SIdVF...cDKLbsBY" }
{ "kty": "AKP", "alg": "FN-DSA-512", "pub": "V53SIdVF...uvw2nuCQ" }
{ "kid: "clpwZ...RWYU9CUF", "alg": "FN-DSA-512", "typ": "JWT" }
{ / kty AKP / 1: 7, / alg FN-DSA-512 / 3: -54, / public key / -1: h'7803c0f9...3f6e2c70', / private key / -2: h'7803c0f9...3bba7abd' }
{ / kty AKP / 1: 7, / alg FN-DSA-512 / 3: -54, / public key / -1: h'7803c0f9...3f6e2c70', }
18([ <<{ / alg FN-DSA-512 / 1: -54, }>>, / unprotected / {}, / payload / h'66616b65', / signature / h'53e855e8...0f263549' ])
-02¶
Converted to markdown¶
Applied feedback from IESG Evaluation on ML-DSA¶
Revised references¶
Revised abstract¶
-01¶
We would like to especially thank David Balenson for careful review of approaches taken in this document. We would also like to thank Michael B. Jones for guidance in authoring.¶