Internet-Draft | Auto-Config of Email Server Settings | August 2025 |
Eggert & Diephouse | Expires 27 February 2026 | [Page] |
This document specifies an automatic configuration mechanism for email, calendar, and contact user agent applications. Service providers publish standardized configuration information that user agent applications retrieve and use to simplify server setup procedures.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 27 February 2026.¶
Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
Manual configuration of email, calendar, and contact user agent applications requires users to correctly specify numerous technical parameters including server hostnames, port numbers, and authentication protocols. This manual process frequently results in configuration errors and setup failures, even among technically skilled users.¶
This document defines a mechanism that significantly simplifies this configuration process. Service providers can publish standardized configuration data that user agents can automatically retrieve and use. In most cases, users need only provide their email address and account password to complete the setup.¶
For service providers that support the OAuth Profile for Open Public Clients [OAuthPublic], this mechanism also enables automatic OAuth configuration. The user agent automatically determines all necessary details to set up OAuth authentication for the associated account.¶
In protocol examples, this document uses a prefix of "C: " to denote lines sent by the user agent to the server, and "S: " for lines sent by the server to the user agent. Lines prefixed with "// " are comments explaining the previous protocol line. These prefixes and comments are not part of the protocol. Lines without any of these prefixes are continuations of the previous line, and no line break is present in the protocol unless specifically mentioned.¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
The automatic configuration process begins when a user wants to set up their user agent application. The user agent requests the user's email address and then uses the domain portion of that address to retrieve configuration data for the account.¶
Configuration retrieval uses the Well-Known URIs mechanism defined in [RFC8615]. The specific suffix for this configuration is user-agent-configuration
. Section 5.2 provides detailed information about how to retrieve this configuration.¶
The configuration is provided as a JSON document (detailed in Section 4) that informs the user agent about:¶
The user agent uses this configuration to determine whether the provider supports protocols that the user agent can also use, helping decide whether to continue with the setup process. For example, an email user agent might check for support of JMAP, IMAP, POP3, and SMTP protocols.¶
Next, the user agent typically connects to the relevant services to verify which authentication methods they support and whether the user agent can use those methods. For instance, if the user agent needs both IMAP and SMTP, it will connect to both servers to check their capabilities and confirm compatibility with the user agent's supported authentication mechanisms.¶
Based on the available options, the user agent then proceeds with one of two approaches:¶
Finally, the user agent uses the obtained credentials (OAuth tokens or password) to connect to the servers specified in the configuration document and validates that the credentials work correctly with the desired protocols.¶
The configuration document describes which services are available and their corresponding endpoints for a specific domain.¶
The configuration file MUST conform to the JSON schema specification provided in Appendix A.¶
The configuration uses the media type application/json
. The HTTP server MUST set the corresponding Content-Type
header as specified in [RFC7231].¶
The following example demonstrates a typical JSON configuration:¶
{ "protocols": { "jmap": { "url": "https://jmap.example.com/session" }, "imap": { "host": "imap.example.com" }, "pop3": { "host": "pop3.example.com" }, "smtp": { "host": "smtp.example.com" }, "caldav": { "url": "https://sync.example.com/calendar/" }, "carddav": { "url": "https://sync.example.com/contacts/" } }, "authentication": { "oauth-public": { "issuer": "auth.example.com" }, "password": true }, "info": { "provider": { "name": "Example Provider Name", "shortName": "Example", "logo": [ { "url": "https://www.example.net/logo.svg", "content-type": "image/svg+xml" } ] }, "help": { "documentation": "https://help.example.net/howto/set-up-your-mail-app.html", "developer": "https://developer.example.net/client-apps/", "contact": ["mailto:it@team.example.net"] } } }¶
The protocols
object specifies all protocols that the domain supports and identifies the server endpoint for each protocol.¶
For the following HTTP-based protocols:¶
each protocol entry MUST include a url
value containing a URL with the https
scheme. This URL MUST specify an endpoint that serves the corresponding protocol. The server MUST use the default port 443 for HTTPS, and the URL MUST NOT include an explicit port number.¶
Example:¶
"jmap": { "url": "https://jmap.example.com/session" }¶
For the following text-based protocols:¶
each protocol entry MUST include a host
value specifying the hostname of the server that provides the corresponding protocol. The server MUST use the default port number for that protocol, with connections secured using TLS. Section 5.4.3 goes into details about TLS and which ports to use.¶
Example:¶
"imap": { "host": "imap.mail.example.com" }¶
The authentication
object specifies which authentication mechanisms the provider supports.¶
The nested password
value indicates whether the provider supports username and password authentication.¶
The nested oauth-public
object contains a single issuer
value that specifies the authorization server issuer identifier. User agents can use this identifier for authentication via [OAuthPublic]. The presence of the oauth-public
object indicates that the provider supports OAuth.¶
The info
object contains information that user agents can present to users. The only required field is info/provider/name
, which SHOULD clearly identify the provider to the user. The optional info/provider/shortName
provides a shorter version of name
.¶
The info/provider/logo
array can contain one or more entries pointing to the provider's logo images. User agents can use these to display the provider's logo to users.¶
The info/help/documentation
field provides a URL that can be presented to users for additional information about the provider. The info/help/developer
field contains a URL with information specifically for user agent developers. The info/help/contact
array lists URLs that users can use to contact the provider, such as mailto
URLs.¶
A minimal info
example:¶
"info": { "provider": { "name": "Example Provider Name" } }¶
provider
object can have name
, shortName
, and logo
properties.¶
The name
and shortName
values are intended for display to the user.¶
The name
property specifies the provider's display name, such as
the name used in the provider's marketing materials. It SHOULD be no
longer than 30 characters, but MUST be no longer than 60 characters.¶
The shortName
property is optional. It specifies a brief version of the provider's name, as
commonly recognized by users. It SHOULD be no longer than 12
characters, and it MUST NOT be longer than 20 characters.¶
Both name
and shortName
MUST NOT include any Control-characters and SHOULD NOT include any excessive white space.¶
The logo
property contains an array of provider logo variants.
User agents select the variant that best matches their UI requirements and technical constraints.¶
Each object in the array contains the following properties:¶
url
- Location where the logo can be retrieved. User agents MAY download
the logo file during configuration and store it locally.¶
content-type
- Media type of the logo image. This follows [RFC2045] media type format, specifying the main type and subtype without parameters. The main media type MUST be image
.¶
width
- Image width in pixels. Optional. Omitted for SVG files.¶
height
- Image height in pixels. Optional. Omitted for SVG files.¶
The logos SHOULD at least include one of each¶
These fields are intended to allow a service provider to provide additional information about configuring user agents.¶
The documentation
property should link to a document intended for users. It can provide additional information to users about how to configure their user agent. A user agent MAY choose to display a link to this URL. User agent SHOULD NOT display links with a URL scheme other than https
.¶
The developer
property should link to a document intended for user agent developers. The document this URL links to can provide additional information to the developer.¶
The contact
property should provide a way for user agent developers to contact the service providers. It is not intended as a way for users to contact the service provider. User agents MUST NOT display this link in their user interface. This URL would typically be a mailto
URL or a URL linking to a contact form for developers to use.¶
Section 3 provides a high-level overview of the automatic configuration process. This section details the individual steps involved in this process.¶
During the initial configuration process, the user agent requests the user's email address. User agents SHOULD accept any valid mailbox
format as specified in Section 3.4 of [RFC5322].¶
After the user provides their email address, the client extracts the domain
part of the user’s email address according to Section 3.4.1 of [RFC5322]. For example¶
Text Entered by User | domain |
---|---|
jdoe@foo.example.com | foo.example.com |
"J Doe" <jdoe@foo.example.com> | foo.example.com |
<jdoe@foo.example.com> | foo.example.com |
The user agent retrieves configuration data over HTTP using the format described in Section 4.¶
Configuration retrieval uses [RFC8615] Well-Known URIs. The user agent constructs the URI using the domain from the user's email address and the configuration name user-agent-configuration
. The detailed URI construction process is specified in [RFC8615].¶
The URI follows this template:¶
https://{domain}/.well-known/user-agent-configuration¶
If the user’s email address’ domain is foo.example.com
, the user agent constructs the following URI:¶
https://foo.example.com/.well-known/user-agent-configuration¶
This URI always uses the https
scheme. User agents MUST retrieve the configuration file only via https
(HTTP over TLS).¶
The user agent MUST validate that the connection is secured by TLS. See Section 7.4 for details about TLS with respect to retrieving the configuration.¶
The media type of the configuration is application/json
, and the HTTP server MUST set a corresponding Content-Type
type header. See [RFC7231]. The user agent MUST validate that the content-type of the returned resource is application/json
.¶
The HTTP server that serves the JSON configuration MUST NOT require any form of HTTP authentication to return the configuration.¶
For example:¶
C: GET /.well-known/user-agent-configuration HTTP/2 C: Host: foo.example.com C: user-agent: curl/8.4.0 C: accept: application/json C: S: HTTP/2 200 S: server: nginx/1.25.3 S: date: Mon, 23 Oct 2025 10:30:00 GMT S: content-type: application/json S: content-length: 1184 S: S: { S: "protocols": { S: "jmap": { S: ...¶
To construct the Well-Known URI described in Section 5.2.1, the user agent requires a hostname. If the URI generated according to that section does not allow the user agent to retrieve a valid configuration, the user agent MAY attempt to retrieve an alternative hostname using DNS as described in this section. The user agent then uses this alternative hostname to construct an alternative Well-Known URI.¶
The user agent MUST NOT use DNS to retrieve an alternative hostname if the URI described in Section 5.2.1 successfully provides a valid configuration.¶
When a user agent uses DNS for configuration discovery, it SHOULD validate all DNS responses using DNSSEC as described in [RFC9364] or a similar secure mechanism. See Section 7.3 for detailed security considerations.¶
The user agent sends a DNS request for the SRV
Resource Record Type with a QNAME
(Query Name) using the template _ua-auto-config._https.{domain}
.¶
For example, if the user entered the email address jdoe@foo.example.com
, the user agent performs a SRV
lookup of _ua-auto-config._https.foo.example.com.
.¶
The DNS response would then give the user agent the name to use instead of the email address’ domain
to construct the Well-Known URI. For example:¶
;; QUESTION SECTION: ;_ua-auto-config._https.foo.example.com. IN SRV ;; ANSWER SECTION: _ua-auto-config._https.foo.example.com. 7200 IN SRV 10 60 443 qux.example.com.¶
The DNS response returns the name qux.example.com
, and the user agent would then attempt to retrieve the configuration from the Well-Known URI¶
https://qux.example.com/.well-known/user-agent-configuration¶
The target in the response is the domain name that will be used for the Well-Known URI. The port in the response MUST be 443, and user agents MUST ignore any response where the port is not 443.¶
If retrieving the configuration using both the well-known domain (as described in Section 5.2.1) and using DNS SRV (as described in Section 5.2.2.1) fail, the user agent MAY choose to retrieve an alternative hostname by retrieving an MX
record as described in the following.¶
The user agent MUST NOT use DNS MX to retrieve an alternative hostname if the approaches described in Sections 5.2.1 or 5.2.2.1 allow the user agent to retrieve a valid configuration.¶
The user agent requests the MX
records for the domain
of the user’s email address. It then picks the hosts with the lowest priority value.¶
For each of the lowest priority value hostnames, the user agent then performs a DNS SRV lookup as described in Section 5.2.2.1 to retrieve a hostname and in turn construct a Well-Known URI for the configuration.¶
For example, if the user entered jdoe@foo.example.com
as their email address, the user agent would construct a DNS query MX lookup using foo.example.com
as the QNAME
(Query Name).¶
;; QUESTION SECTION: ;foo.example.com. IN MX ;; ANSWER SECTION: foo.example.com. 3600 IN MX 10 mail1.example.com. foo.example.com. 3600 IN MX 20 mail2.example.com.¶
The user agent would then perform a SRV lookup using _ua-auto-config._https.mail1.example.com
as the QNAME
:¶
;; QUESTION SECTION: ;_ua-auto-config._https.mail1.example.com. IN SRV ;; ANSWER SECTION: _ua-auto-config._https.mail1.example.com. 7200 IN SRV 10 60 443 mail.example.com.¶
The user agent would then use the Well-Known URI¶
https://mail.example.com/.well-known/user-agent-configuration¶
to retrieve the configuration.¶
User agents SHOULD validate that the configuration contains valid JSON syntax according to RFC 8259. Additionally, user agents SHOULD validate the retrieved configuration against the JSON schema specification provided in Appendix A. If the JSON syntax is invalid, user agents SHOULD ignore the configuration entirely and not use any portion of it.¶
User agents SHOULD process only the properties that they support and SHOULD ignore properties not specified in the schema. This requirement enables future extensions of the format without breaking existing user agent implementations.¶
After retrieving the configuration JSON, the user agent needs to determine:¶
Both user agents and servers support multiple protocols. The user agent needs to decide which protocols to use and determine whether the protocols specified in the configuration are sufficient to proceed. This document does not provide recommendations regarding protocol preferences or minimum protocol requirements, as these decisions depend on the specific needs and implementation details of individual user agents.¶
The automatic configuration flow covers two distinct authentication types:¶
User agents can support one or both authentication methods. Similarly, servers for each protocol can support one or both methods. Additionally, the specific implementation details of authentication can vary between protocols.¶
User agents SHOULD probe each protocol and server of interest to determine compatible authentication methods. This probing process could influence the user agent's protocol selection. This probing process also allows the user agent to verify server availability.¶
This document does not provide recommendations regarding protocol preferences. The user agent MUST make these decisions based on its needs, and any such decision is very specific to the implementation at hand.¶
If the user agent determines that it can use either password based authentication or OAuth authentication, the user agent SHOULD prefer using OAuth based authentication.¶
The JSON configuration includes an oauth-public
entry when the provider supports OAuth. According to Section 2.2 of [OAuthPublic], the OAuth Authorization Server Metadata is served at a URL constructed using the issuer
value with the template https://{issuer}/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server
.¶
For example, if the JSON configuration contains this entry:¶
"oauth-public" : { "issuer" : "auth.example.com" },¶
The OAuth Authorization Server Metadata would be at the URL https://auth.example.com/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server
¶
Before the user agent chooses to use OAuth for any protocols, it SHOULD make sure that it can retrieve the OAuth Authorization Server Metadata from the corresponding URI.¶
The user agent SHOULD connect to each protocol that it might be interested in to detect which authentication mechanism it supports. The user agent MUST NOT perform any authentication at this point, but it SHOULD record which mechanism(s) the server for each protocol of interest supports.¶
The user agent SHOULD still probe each server as described in the next sections 5.4.2 and 5.4.3 to check that the servers it is interested in have OAuth support.¶
To check which HTTP authentication schemes a particular HTTP server supports, the user agent SHOULD send a request to the server’s endpoint without any `Authorization` header. For example¶
GET /jmap/session HTTP/1.1 host: api.example.com accept: application/json¶
As detailed in [RFC7235] the server SHOULD respond to this with a 401 Unauthorized
status code and a www-authenticate
response header indicating which authentication scheme(s) are supported.¶
The user agent SHOULD include an accept
header with the content type it would expect for the given protocol. For JMAP, for example, the user agent SHOULD include accept: application/json
as a header in this request.¶
If the server supports OAuth, the www-authenticate
response header would include Bearer
. [RFC6749] describes this in more detail. [RFC6750] and [RFC7616] describe username + password authentication using the so-called 'Basic' HTTP authentication scheme and the HTTP digest access authentication respectively. Other password based authentication mechanisms exist for HTTP, but their discussion is outside the scope of this document.¶
For example, a response header¶
HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized www-authenticate: Bearer realm="api.example.com"¶
would indicate that the server supports OAuth.¶
Alternatively, a response such as¶
HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized www-authenticate: Digest realm="api.example.com", qop="auth", algorithm=SHA-256, nonce="dcd98b7102dd2f0e8b11d0f600bfb0c093", opaque="5ccc069c403ebaf9f0171e9517f40e41"¶
would indicate that the server supports digest access authentication.¶
Details of HTTP authentication are described in [RFC7235] but it is worth noting that a server supporting multiple authentication methods can return either multiple www-authenticate
header fields in its response or a single www-authenticate
header field with multiple authentication methods.¶
For text based protocols (IMAP, POP3, and SMTP) the client SHOULD connect to the server to check that¶
The client MUST attempt to connect to the server on the default ports¶
using TLS. See [RFC2595] and [RFC3207] for details about using TLS with these protocols.¶
The client SHOULD NOT attempt to connect to an IMAP, POP3, or SMTP server on their cleartext ports.¶
The client MUST NOT allow for configuration with a cleartext protocol that is not protected by TLS.¶
The client MUST validate that the connection is secured by TLS, and that the TLS certificate is valid and matches the expected domain name. See Section 7.4 for details on TLS validation.¶
If the server announces either the OAUTHBEARER
SASL authentication method, the client can assume that this server supports using [OAuthPublic]. For IMAP for example, if the server’s CAPABILITY
contains AUTH=OAUTHBEARER
this would indicate this support.¶
Servers SHOULD NOT announce support for the OAUTHBEARER
SASL mechanism if they do not support [OAuthPublic]. Servers MUST announce support for the OAUTHBEARER
SASL mechanism if they support OAuth Profile for Open Public Clients. Servers SHOULD NOT use the XOAUTH2
SASL mechanism.¶
There are various SASL authentication mechanisms for password based authentication, and additionally IMAP and POP3 also support password based authentication through LOGIN
and APOP
respectively. The client needs to probe each server to determine which authentication methods are supported by both the client and the server.¶
The IMAP protocol provides various other authentication mechanisms. There are various SASL mechanisms for username + password authentication. [RFC4959] describes how to use SASL with IMAP.¶
Unless the server sends the LOGINDISABLED
capability, clients know that they can use the LOGIN
command for username + password authentication.¶
For IMAP, a sample session might look like this:¶
S: * OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4 IMAP4rev1 SASL-IR AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=OAUTHBEARER] IMAP Server C: A1 LOGOUT S: * BYE S: A1 OK¶
In this case the server returned its IMAP capabilities as part of the so-called greeting messages. The support for the OAUTHBEARER
SASL authentication mechanism indicates to the client that the server supports OAuth. Similarly the PLAIN
SASL authentication mechanism indicates that the server supports username + password authentication. The absence of the LOGINDISABLED
also indicates support for username and password authentication.¶
If the server doesn’t include its capabilities in the server greeting, the client SHOULD send a CAPABILITY
command as outlined in Section 6.1.1 of [RFC3501]. The client SHOULD send a LOGOUT
command as outlined in Section 6.1.3 of [RFC3501] and check that the server sends an untagged BYE
response.¶
SMTP similarly announces which authentication mechanisms is supports. [RFC4954] describes how to use SASL with SMTP.¶
For SMTP, the client would use the EHLO
command to retrieve the SMTP server’s supported authentication mechanisms. For example:¶
S: 220 smtp.example.com ESMTP service ready C: EHLO client.example.com S: 250-smtp.example.com S: 250-PIPELINING S: 250-SIZE 10240000 S: 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN OAUTHBEARER S: 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES S: 250 8BITMIME C: QUIT S: 221 Bye¶
Section 3.2 of [RFC5321] describe this client initiation of the SMTP protocol. [RFC4954] describes SMTP authentication in detail. In the above example PLAIN
and LOGIN
indicate that the server supports username + password based authentication, and OAUTHBEARER
indicates that the server supports OAuth.¶
The client SHOULD send a QUIT
command and check for the server’s 221 Bye
response.¶
For POP3 [RFC5034] describes how to use SASL. POP3 additionally supports password based authentication using its USER
and PASS
commands, or through the optional APOP
command. The client can check which SASL authentication methods the server supports using the CAPA
command.¶
For example:¶
S: +OK pop.example.com POP3 server ready C: CAPA S: +OK List of capabilities follows S: SASL PLAIN OAUTHBEARER S: IMPLEMENTATION BlurdyBlurp POP3 server S: . C: QUIT S: +OK POP3 server signing off (maildrop empty)¶
The client SHOULD send a QUIT
command and check for the server’s +OK
response.¶
The client SHOULD display to the user the hostnames of all servers that it intends to authenticate with. This list of server hostnames gives the user a chance to validate if they want to move ahead.¶
The client MAY choose to limit the hostnames to their second-level domain names when displaying this list. Instead of displaying mail.example.com
the client would display example.com
if it chooses to do so. Limiting the hostnames to their second-level domain names helps users identify if this is the domain they intend to connect to or not.¶
The client MUST NOT cut off parts of long second-level domains, to avoid spoofing. At least 63 characters of the second-level domain names MUST be displayed.¶
If the user mistyped their email address in Section 5.1, letting the user confirm the server hostnames gives the user a chance to notice this.¶
Clients can enhance the user experience by using the info
section of the configuration (described in Section 4.4) to display the provider's name and logo during this configuration step.¶
Section 7.1 list security considerations related to the user confirming these hostnames.¶
For password-based authentication, the full addr-spec
part of the email address MUST be used as the username. For example:¶
Text Entered by User | username |
---|---|
jdoe@example.com | jdoe@example.com |
"J Doe" <jdoe@example.com> | jdoe@example.com |
<jdoe@example.com> | jdoe@example.com |
For OAuth Profile for Open Public Clients, the client MUST send this username as the login_hint
in the authorization request URL.¶
The provider MUST ensure that any valid email address that the user might enter during setup is a valid username for all servers given in this configuration. This will require a mapping on the server level from email address to internal username. This mapping happens internally in the server and the client is not involved in this mapping.¶
If the client and the provider both support OAuth Profile for Open Public Clients, and if the servers that the client wants to use support OAuth, the client can configure OAuth.¶
The authentication
section in the JSON configuration described in Section 4.3 will let the client create a URL to retrieve the OAuth Authorization Server Metadata as described in section Section 5.4.1. With this metadata, the client can then use [OAuthPublic] to configure OAuth.¶
Part of this will require opening the authorization request URL in an external user-agent, which is typically the default browser. The client SHOULD make it very apparent to the user which hostname is being used for the authorization request URL. The client SHOULD make the user confirm least the second-level domain name(s) of the hostname of this URL. This is to minimize the risk of the user exposing their credentials to a third party.¶
As described in Section 5.5, the client SHOULD also confirm the server hostnames with the user. For OAuth authentication, the client SHOULD include the hostname of the authorization request URL in this list of hostnames.¶
If the client and provider both support password-based authentication, and if the servers that the client wants to use support password-based authentication, the client can configure itself to use these servers.¶
The client SHOULD at this point ask the user for the password for their account with the provider.¶
Once the user has entered their password, the client SHOULD validate that it is able to authenticate using the entered password with all servers that it is interested in. Only then would it save the new configuration.¶
Regardless of the mechanism used to obtain the configuration, clients SHOULD display the configuration details to users and request explicit confirmation before use. During this confirmation process:¶
If OAuth2 is used, the OAuth2 server MUST adhere to [OAuthPublic].¶
Notably, the Dynamic Client Registration MUST be implemented and return a working Client ID in response HTTP calls defined by the specification.¶
The OAuth2 scopes defined in [OAuthPublic] MUST be included and MUST give access to the servers returned in the JSON configuration described in Section 4.¶
A single token MUST work for all servers in the JSON configuration, such that a single user login is sufficient for all services. For that purpose, the client will include all relevant scopes in the authentication requests.¶
While the mechanism described in this document makes it easier for users to correctly configure their user agent, there’s an associated risk with making it easier for users to expose their credentials to a third party.¶
User agents using the mechanism described in this document need to design their user interface and user experience such that this risk is minimized. Actual affordances depend on implementation details of the user interface and are outside the scope of this document.¶
As part of the first step of the mechanism described in this document, the user enters their email address. If the user mistyped the domain part of their email address, and if the mistyped domain exists and supports the mechanism described in this document, the user could expose their credentials to the owner of that domain. An attacker could use this in an attempt to gain knowledge of the user’s credentials.¶
As a result, user agents need to carefully design their user interface and user experience as to let the user know which domain is being used. It would make sense to display this very clearly to the user, before they enter any credentials.¶
The user agent would want to display a list of all second-level domains (SLDs) for all the servers that it intends to use. The user can then confirm these.¶
When the mechanism described in this document uses OAuth, it would make sense to ask the user to confirm the domains of the servers that will be used and additionally confirm the domains of¶
When asking the user to confirm these domains, it would make sense to only display the second-level domain (SLD) of those domains. This would make it more difficult for an attacker to do URL obfuscation and use subdomain phishing.¶
When using a browser for OAuth, the user agent would want to display the second-level domain (SLD) that the browser is currently displaying, and update this when redirects happen or new pages are loaded.¶
If an attacker can direct the user agent to use an attacker-controlled JSON configuration, the attacker would be able to direct the user to servers of the attacker's choosing.¶
In Section 7.1 some mechanisms to limit this attack vector are described.¶
However, the user agent needs to combine this with a conservative trust policy for its TLS when retrieving the JSON configuration.¶
If the user agent uses the DNS mechanisms described in Section 5.2.2, care needs to be taken to make sure that an attacker hasn’t altered the DNS response. Using DNSSEC is one method of improving the security aspects of this approach. Alternatively, user agents MAY choose not use the DNS based mechanisms described in Section 5.2.2 at all.¶
Whenever TLS is used, clients MUST validate TLS certificates and ensure that certificates are valid for the hostnames specified in the configuration. If certificate validation fails or the TLS certificate is otherwise invalid, the client MUST disconnect and MUST NOT use any configuration retrieved from that URI.¶
Certificate validation failures represent significant security risks, as they may indicate attempts to redirect users' credentials to an attacker. Clients SHOULD NOT allow users to override TLS certificate validation checks.¶
Clients MAY implement more restrictive TLS policies for configuration retrieval than those typically required for web browsing, in order to provide stronger security guarantees. Clients MAY want to limit the allowed protocol version(s) to recent versions, and MAY similarly want to restrict the allowed cipher suites.¶
The mechanism described in this document can be used to upgrade a user's configuration. The user agent could check for configurations even when it has a working configuration for an account. If the user agent finds a configuration that is better (in some way) than the already existing configuration, it could then upgrade the existing configuration.¶
But in doing so, the user agent would increase the attack window that a potential attacker has. Instead of only giving an attacker the opportunity when the user configures their user agent for the first time, the attacker would now have an opportunity each time the user agent checks for a better configuration. That could be undesirable.¶
This document establishes the user-agent auto-configuration protocol registry.¶
User-agent auto-configuration protocols are registered on the advice of one or more Designated Experts (appointed by the IESG or their delegate), with a Specification Required (using terminology from [RFC8126]). However, to allow for the allocation of values prior to publication, the Designated Expert(s) may approve registration once they are satisfied that such a specification will be published.¶
Registration requests are sent to the ____@ietf.org mailing list for review and comment, with an appropriate subject (e.g., "Request for well-known URI: example").¶
Before a period of 14 days has passed, the Designated Expert(s) will either approve or deny the registration request, communicating this decision both to the review list and to IANA. Denials should include an explanation and, if applicable, suggestions as to how to make the request successful. Registration requests that are undetermined for a period longer than 21 days can be brought to the IESG's attention (using the iesg@iesg.org mailing list) for resolution.¶
protocols
object in the JSON configuration described in Section 4¶
https
. If left empty, the protocols
entry in the JSON configuration will only specify a hostname using host
. If a URL scheme is specified, the JSON configuration entry will instead use url
with a URL using this URL scheme.¶
Name | Protocol Key | URL scheme | Specification | Additional Properties |
---|---|---|---|---|
JMAP |
jmap
|
https | RFC 8620, RFC 8621, RFC 8887, RFC 9610 | |
IMAP |
imap
|
RFC 9051 | ||
POP3 |
pop3
|
RFC 1939, RFC 5034 | ||
SMTP |
smtp
|
RFC 5321, RFC 2822 | ||
CalDAV |
caldav
|
https | RFC 4791 | |
CardDAV |
carddav
|
https | RFC 6352 | |
WebDAV |
webdav
|
https | RFC 4918 | |
ManageSieve |
managesieve
|
RFC 5804, RFC 5228 |
The Additional Properties field is empty in all of the initial values.¶
This registers the user-agent-configuration
name from Section 5.2.1 according to [RFC8615].¶
uaac
This registers the name ua-auto-config
from Section 5.2.2 according to [RFC6335].¶
The following JSON schema defines the format of the JSON configuration in Section 4¶
{ "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "$id": "ua-auto-conf", "title": "User-Agent Automatic Configuration", "description": "Automatic Configuration of Email, Calendar, and Contact Server Settings", "type": "object", "properties": { "protocols": { "type": "object", "properties": { "jmap": { "$ref": "#/$defs/http-server" }, "imap": { "$ref": "#/$defs/text-server" }, "pop3": { "$ref": "#/$defs/text-server" }, "smtp": { "$ref": "#/$defs/text-server" }, "caldav": { "$ref": "#/$defs/http-server" }, "carddav": { "$ref": "#/$defs/http-server" } } }, "authentication": { "properties": { "oauth-public": { "properties": { "issuer": { "format": "hostname", "type": "string" } }, "required": [ "issuer" ], "type": "object" }, "password": { "type": "boolean" } }, "required": [ "password" ] }, "info": { "type": "object", "properties": { "provider": { "type": "object", "properties": { "name": { "type": "string", "minLength": 1 }, "shortName": { "type": "string", "minLength": 1 }, "logo": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "object", "properties": { "url": { "type": "string", "format": "uri" }, "content-type": { "type": "string", "minLength": 1 }, "width": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 1 }, "height": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 1 } }, "required": [ "url", "content-type" ] } } }, "required": [ "name" ] }, "help": { "type": "object", "properties": { "documentation": { "type": "string", "format": "uri" }, "developer": { "type": "string", "format": "uri" }, "contact": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string", "minLength": 1 } } } } }, "required": [ "provider" ] } }, "required": [ "protocols", "info" ], "$defs": { "http-server": { "type": "object", "properties": { "url": { "type": "string", "format": "uri" } }, "required": ["url"] }, "text-server": { "type": "object", "properties": { "host": { "type": "string", "format": "hostname" } }, "required": ["host"] } } }¶
This document is based on the work of Ben Bucksch.¶